One product, one panel, one record.

Thorne FloraSport 20B, 30 capsules (SKU SF818) — label audit

Two of the four strain designators were removed from the label between 2023 and 2024, and the live product page ships the degraded version. The two that were deleted are precisely the two with essentially no human literature — one of them returns zero PubMed records on two spellings, and it accounts for a quarter of the CFU.

This page is an audit of a label. It records what this product’s panel discloses, what of that could be checked against a primary record, and what could not. The score below ranks this product on that disclosure and on nothing else.

The record this page rests on

NIH label record
Label read on
The most recent dated artefact behind this page. Labels change; this is how old our reading of it is.
Cohort
Addendum — outside the founding denominators Audited 2026-07-31, after the founding cohort of 27 was frozen. It sits outside every D27 denominator this site publishes.
How deep this went
Label audit — the lighter pass What the label says, what basis it gives for its CFU number, whether the strains are coded, whether a government label record exists — checked and published. No full claim inventory was written for this SKU. It is a real result, and it is a shallower one than the teardowns above it, which is why the page says so before you weigh it against them.
What did not survive verification
Part of this page was refuted or could not be reproduced Two bounded items, both about which label generation a given fact belongs to. First, the panel published here is a composite across two government records and that is stated rather than smoothed over. The organism roster and the designator status are taken from the current 2024 label (DSLD 306247) and from the live product page, which agree: two of four organisms are printed bare. The four per-strain quantities of 5 billion CFU each are taken from the superseded 2023 label (DSLD 298031), and whether the 2024 label still prints per-strain amounts was not separately established — so those quantities are dated to 2023 and must not be quoted as the current panel's. Second, the source audit's own summary table records "4 of 4" strain designators on label while its detailed record for this product states that the 2024 label prints only 2 of 4 and that the live page matches the degraded version. This page transcribes the detailed record, because it is the one that cites both DSLD identifiers and the live ingredient table; the summary line is read as describing the 2023 generation. Anyone quoting a designator count for this SKU must say which label year they mean. What did survive verification: the regression itself, documented across two dated government records and the live page; the at-expiry footnote, verbatim in the DSLD transcription and corroborated on the product page; the NSF Certified for Sport listing, confirmed at nsfsport.com on two independent keywords; UALpc-04 returning zero PubMed records on two spellings and UALa-01 returning one; and the absence of any Thorne men's probiotic across two DSLD queries.

The Label Verifiability Score for this product

78.0 out of 100

Rank 37 of the 154 products in this audit the rubric can score.

The score measures one thing: how much of what you are buying this company tells you, and how much of that survives being checked against a source that is not the company. It does not measure whether the product works — this site holds no efficacy data of its own, and 0 of 294 organism slots in the founding cohort carry a strain with a human randomised trial for any male-specific outcome, so nobody in this category has evidence that would support a ranking by effect.

Computed over the whole rubric: this record answers all five questions below, so nothing is renormalised away and the divisor is the full 1.00. That share travels with every score on this site and is never dropped — a score over part of the rubric’s weight and the same score over all of it are different claims.

How the 78.0 is arrived at: the five components of the Label Verifiability Score, each with the weight it carries and the fraction this label actually earned.
Component Weight What was counted, and where Fraction Weight × fraction
Strain identity printed on the panel 0.24 2 of 4 organism slots carry a printed strain designator. 2 / 4 = 0.5000 0.1200
Per-organism amount printed 0.20 4 of 4 organism slots have an amount of its own; the rest are inside a blend total. 4 / 4 = 1.0000 0.2000
What the CFU count is measured against 0.22 Potency basis "through-expiry": CFU figure printed yes, single basis stated yes, basis reaches expiry yes — 3 of 3. 3 / 3 = 1.0000 0.2200
Printed designators that lead to a human trial 0.20 2 of 4 checked organism slots resolve to at least one human randomised trial under the designator exactly as printed. This counts whether the identity leads to a trial, never what the trial found. 2 / 4 = 0.5000 0.1000
Certification confirmed at the issuer’s own register 0.14 1 claimed certification found on the issuer’s own public register. Read the scope before reading the mark: most certify one narrow property. 1 / 1 = 1.0000 0.1400
The five weights sum to 1.00. This record answers all five, so the divisor below is that full 1.00 and nothing has been renormalised away. Fractions are shown to four decimals and the weighted values to six, which is the precision at which adding the last column by hand, dividing, and rounding to one decimal reproduces the published score on every product in this audit. The site's own arithmetic uses the exact fractions and rounds once at the end, so the printed total can differ from the column's own sum in the sixth decimal and never in the score. Recomputed from this product's own record on every build. A stored score that no longer follows from the record it summarises fails the build.

0.7800 — the last column added up — divided by 1.00, the weight this record could answer, is 0.7800. Multiplied by 100 and rounded to one decimal, that is the 78.0 above.

What this label discloses

Everything in this table is what the product itself states — on the printed panel, on the brand’s own page, or in the label record the manufacturer filed. Nothing in it is checked yet; checking is the next section.

What Thorne FloraSport 20B, 30 capsules (SKU SF818) discloses, as recorded from its label and label record.
Disclosure As recorded
CFU as printed 20 billion CFUs
What that count is measured against Through expiry
Strain designators Some organisms coded
Organism slots transcribed here 4 — the full panel
Marketed as Unisex
Source: DSLD 306247, 298031

Panel footnote, verbatim from the DSLD transcription: "20 billion CFUs, at time of expiration when stored as recommended". Corroborated on the product page's own feature list: "20 billion live organisms at time of expiration". Storage is room temperature, no refrigeration. This is the honest form of the claim. Worth noting alongside it: the expiry footnote is dropped from Thorne's machine-readable ingredient table, which renders as a bare "5000000000cfus".

The panel’s own words on potency, verbatim.

The panel guarantees the count through the expiration or best-by date. This is the only basis that is falsifiable by a reader holding the bottle.

Some organisms carry a printed strain designator and some are named by species only.

Every organism named on the panel of Thorne FloraSport 20B, 30 capsules (SKU SF818), in panel order, with what its designator resolves to.
Organism as printed Designator as printed Quantity as printed What the designator resolves to The query we ran
Bifidobacterium animalis lactis (correct name: Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis) HN019 5 billion CFU Human RCT PubMed designator search, records and randomised-controlled-trial-tagged subset
Bacillus subtilis DE111 5 billion CFU Human RCT PubMed designator search, records and randomised-controlled-trial-tagged subset
Lactobacillus acidophilus — none printed 5 billion CFU No designator printed
Lactobacillus paracasei (correct name: Lacticaseibacillus paracasei) — none printed 5 billion CFU No designator printed
The query column is the exact search string, so that a reader can re-run it and get our result or a different one.

What of that is verifiable

A disclosure is verifiable when a reader can open a record that neither we nor the brand controls and see the same thing. Below is every dated artefact this page rests on. What is absent from this list is not verified, however reasonable it sounds.

  • NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database record DSLD 306247 (opens in a new tab) captured The current label record, on market. The artefact behind the central finding: it prints bare "Lactobacillus paracasei" and "Lactobacillus acidophilus" where the 2023 record named UALpc-04 and UALa-01, and Thorne's live page matches this degraded version.
  • NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database record DSLD 298031 (opens in a new tab) captured The superseded 2023 label, on market, UPC 6 93749 00631 2 — the hard match to SKU SF818. Both records are FloraSport 20B, 30 capsules, one daily, 250 mg blend, 20 billion CFU, so they are the same SKU across two label generations. Source for all four designators as originally printed, for the four per-strain 5 billion CFU figures, and for the at-expiry footnote verbatim. The per-strain quantities on this page are dated to this record rather than presented as current.
  • Dated capture of the brand’s own pagethorne-florasport-20b-pdp-2026-07-31https://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits. captured Read in-browser, because the page is a fully client-rendered Nuxt application whose HTML carries an empty ld+json block and no price, and whose Wayback snapshots have the same problem. Source for the price, the SKU, the degraded live ingredient table, the "20 billion live organisms at time of expiration" feature line, the Hormone Support tag, the two sex-split athlete claims, and the footnote-stripped machine-readable table.

How many of its strains have a human trial for what it is sold for

Across the frozen founding cohort, 0 of 294 organism slots (0.0%) carry an organism with a human randomised controlled trial for any male-specific outcome. Not for this product — for all 27 of the founding teardowns, taken together. That is the number to hold against any men’s probiotic, including this one.

Two further founding-cohort figures for context: only 43 of 294 organism slots carry a strain with any human RCT at all under the exact code printed on the label, and only 2 of 27 products have a published human trial of the finished formula — the thing actually in the bottle. All three figures divide by the frozen cohort of 27 teardowns and 294 organism slots, never by every teardown on this site.

For this product specifically, 2 organism slots carry a strain with a human RCT under the exact designator printed on the label.

A word on what a designator has to clear before it counts here. The organism must be named with the exact strain code that appears in the trial, the trial must be in humans, and the code must return that trial when a reader searches it. A species name does not qualify: the trials in this field are of strains, and a species contains thousands of them.

What it costs per day

$1.40 a day at the dose the label itself instructs.

Price
$42.00 USD
What that buys
30-capsule bottle (30 servings, 1 capsule daily), SKU SF818
Price checked
the source we read it fromhttps://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

For context, the median verified cost across the frozen founding cohort is $1.52 a day — about $553 a year. The two figures come off one median: 24 priced products give an even count, so the median is the mean of the two middle ones, $1.515 a day. The daily figure is that rounded to the cent; the annual figure is $1.515 × 365 = $ 552.975, rounded to the dollar. Annualising the rounded $1.52 instead gives $ 554.80, which is why the rule is printed rather than left for you to guess at.

That median runs over 24 products, not 27: three of the founding teardowns have no verifiable US price at all, and are excluded rather than estimated. It is not a median over every teardown on this site.

What certification it holds, checked at the issuer’s own register

A badge on a bottle is a claim like any other. Every row below was checked — or not checked — at the certifier’s own public register, never at the badge. Across the frozen founding cohort, 2 of 27 products hold a certification we could confirm at the issuer — a founding-cohort figure, not a count over every teardown on this site.

Certification claims for Thorne FloraSport 20B, 30 capsules (SKU SF818), each checked at the issuer’s own register.
Programme Status at the issuer Checked
NSF Certified for Sport Confirmed at issuer 31 July 2026

NSF Certified for Sport

Found on the certifier’s own public register.

Verified at the issuer's own register. Searching nsfsport.com for the keyword "FloraSport" returns "Thorne® FloraSport 20B®" and "Thorne® FloraSport 20B", listed under both Thorne brand entries, product form Capsule, NSF/ANSI 173. Independently confirmed on a second keyword: a search for "Bacillus" returns 125 results whose only Thorne-branded hits are the same two FloraSport listings. This is a real certification — batch-level testing for label-claim compliance and roughly 300 banned substances — and it is the only mark in its batch that speaks to contents rather than to allergens or facilities.

The register we queried https://www.nsfsport.com/certified-products/search-results.php — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

How it differs from the same brand’s women’s version

Across the fourteen same-brand men’s-versus-women’s label diffs run inside the frozen founding cohort, zero men’s or default formulas contain a probiotic strain, identified by designator, that was selected on male-specific evidence. In eight of the fourteen the sex-specific differentiator is a botanical or a mineral, and in five of the fourteen the women’s SKU is better-specified, cheaper, or both — “better-specified” meaning the panel that discloses more, never the panel with more in it. The rule behind each of those counts, and all fourteen pairs classified against it , are published in full. Diffs run on teardowns added since sit outside this fourteen, and outside the sentence above.

Every finding on this page, with the record behind it

Finding 1 two-of-four-strain-designators-deleted-between-label-versions

The 2023 label (DSLD 298031) named all four strains — UALpc-04, UALa-01, DE111 and HN019. The 2024 label (DSLD 306247) drops the two UAL designators and prints bare "Lactobacillus paracasei" and "Lactobacillus acidophilus", keeping only DE111 and HN019. Thorne's live product page matches the degraded 2024 version, so this is a genuine label regression rather than a fetch artefact.

The record: DSLD 298031 (entered 2023-09-25) versus DSLD 306247 (entered 2024-06-20), both on-market, plus the live thorne.com ingredient table, 2026-07-31 — open it (opens in a new tab)

Finding 2 the-deleted-designators-are-the-two-with-no-evidence

UALpc-04 returns zero PubMed records on two independent spellings, and it is 25% of the CFU in the capsule. UALa-01 returns one record in total. Those are exactly the two designators the 2024 label stopped printing. Half the CFU in this product sits in two strains with a real human evidence base and half sits in two with essentially none.

The record: PubMed absence re-queried on two spellings each, 2026-07-31: UALpc-04 returns 0, UALa-01 returns 1; HN019 111 records / 41 RCT-tagged, DE111 12 / 8 — open it (opens in a new tab)

Finding 3 hormone-support-benefit-tag-with-nothing-behind-it

The product page carries a "Hormone Support" benefit tag and no hormonal endpoint appears anywhere in the product's content. The identical unsupported tag was recorded on Thorne FloraMend in an earlier batch, so this is a pattern rather than a one-off.

The record: thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b benefit tags, read in-browser 2026-07-31 — open ithttps://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

Finding 4 sex-split-efficacy-claims-with-no-dose-and-no-citation

"Promotes decreased percent body fat in female athletes" and "Supports a balanced inflammatory response in male athletes" both appear on the page with nothing attached — no dose, no study, no endpoint.

The record: thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b claim list, verbatim, read in-browser 2026-07-31 — open ithttps://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

Finding 5 claims-hedged-to-the-ingredients-not-the-product

The page reads "The clinically studied benefits of the ingredients in FloraSport" — an ingredient-level hedge that lets trial evidence for a component stand in for evidence about the finished product. The same construction was recorded on FloraMend.

The record: thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b, verbatim, read in-browser 2026-07-31 — open ithttps://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

Finding 6 the-expiry-footnote-is-dropped-from-the-machine-readable-table

The at-expiry guarantee is the best thing on this label, and Thorne's own structured ingredient table renders it as a bare "5000000000cfus" with the footnote stripped. Anything consuming that table machine-side loses the guarantee. Same defect as FloraMend.

The record: thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b machine-readable ingredient table, read in-browser 2026-07-31 — open ithttps://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

What we could not verify

Every gap below is published rather than deleted. Most are derived automatically from the empty fields in this page’s own record, so a gap cannot be hidden by leaving a box blank.

A men’s-versus-women’s label diff
The same brand’s women’s SKU has not been compared against this panel.
Whether the current 2024 label still prints per-strain CFU amounts
The 5 billion per strain figures published here come from DSLD 298031, the 2023 label. The 2024 record (306247) was checked for designators and is the source of the regression finding; whether it retains the four per-strain quantities was not separately established, so the quantities on this page are dated to the 2023 record rather than presented as current.
Any dose or citation behind the sex-split efficacy claims
The page claims "Promotes decreased percent body fat in female athletes" and "Supports a balanced inflammatory response in male athletes" with no dose and no citation attached to either.
Anything behind the "Hormone Support" benefit tag
The tag appears on the product page and no hormonal endpoint appears anywhere in the product's content. The identical unsupported tag was recorded on Thorne FloraMend in an earlier batch.
A machine-readable price or offer block
Thorne's product page is a fully client-rendered Nuxt application: the HTML contains an empty ld+json block and no price, and Wayback snapshots have the same problem. The price was read in-browser on 2026-07-31.

How to check every line of this page yourself

Nothing on this page requires trusting us. Every claim above resolves to a record you can open:

  1. Open the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database record linked at the top of this page. It is the label the manufacturer filed, not our transcription of it.
  2. Compare the CFU line and the suggested-use line against the disclosure table above. If they disagree with us, we are wrong and we want to know.
  3. Take any strain designator from the panel and run the query printed beside it. The query is published precisely so you can get a different answer than we did.
  4. Divide the price by the number of days the label’s own dose instructions make the container last. That arithmetic is the whole of the cost-per-day row.
  5. Search the certifier’s own register for this product, not for the brand. A company can participate in a programme without this product being on its list.

Primary product record: https://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20bhttps://www.thorne.com/products/dp/florasport-20b — Address given, not linked: this site does not link out to the products it audits.

Thorne’s label went backwards, and the government keeps the receipts.

The 2023 label named all four strainsL. paracasei UALpc-04, L. acidophilus UALa-01, B. subtilis DE111, B. animalis lactis HN019, five billion CFU each, which is better dose transparency than most of this category manages. The 2024 label prints two of them bare. “Lactobacillus paracasei.” “Lactobacillus acidophilus.” No codes. And Thorne’s live product page ships the degraded version, so this is a real regression rather than a page that failed to render.

Now look at which two disappeared.

UALpc-04 returns zero PubMed records — re-checked on two independent spellings, across all fields. UALa-01 returns one. Meanwhile HN019 has 111 records with 41 randomised-trial-tagged, and DE111 has 12 with 8. So half the CFU in this capsule sits on real human evidence and half sits on essentially none — and the two designators the label stopped printing are exactly the two with nothing behind them.

Set against that, three things here are genuinely good and should not be lost in the finding.

The potency guarantee is the honest kind. The panel footnote reads “20 billion CFUs, at time of expiration when stored as recommended”, corroborated on the product page. Room temperature, no refrigeration required.

The NSF Certified for Sport mark checks out at the issuer’s own register. Searched at nsfsport.com by two independent keywords, and both return this product under NSF/ANSI 173. That is batch-level testing for label-claim compliance and roughly 300 banned substances — the only mark in its batch that speaks to contents rather than to allergens or facilities.

And the dose transparency, where it exists, is real. Four strains at five billion each is a per-strain split most brands refuse.

Two loose threads. The page carries a “Hormone Support” benefit tag with no hormonal endpoint anywhere in the product, and it makes sex-split efficacy claims“decreased percent body fat in female athletes”, “a balanced inflammatory response in male athletes” — with no dose and no citation attached to either. On a brand that sells a Women’s Daily Probiotic and no men’s probiotic at all.